How Long Was the Shortest Tennis Match in History?
Tennis Match Duration Calculator
Estimated Duration
0 minutes 0 seconds
The shortest tennis match in history was 20 minutes on April 27, 1946, when Jack Kramer defeated Frank Parker 6-0, 6-0. Kramer won all 24 points without allowing Parker to score a single point.
Modern matches average 1 hour 45 minutes on the WTA tour. Your match duration shows how much the game has evolved from the era of Kramer's dominance.
The shortest tennis match in history lasted just 20 minutes. It happened on April 27, 1946, at the Surrey Championships in England, where Jack Kramer defeated his opponent, Frank Parker, 6-0, 6-0. No long rallies. No extended breaks. Just pure, unrelenting dominance. Kramer didn’t just win-he erased the match from the scoreboard in less time than it takes to watch a TV commercial break.
What Made This Match So Fast?
Kramer wasn’t just a good player-he was a revolution on grass. At 21 years old, he had one of the most powerful serves ever seen in tennis. His serve wasn’t just fast; it was placement-perfect. He hit 22 aces in that match. Parker, a former U.S. Open champion, was no pushover. But he couldn’t handle the pace, the spin, or the precision. Every serve landed like a bullet. Every return was weak. Every point ended in under 15 seconds.
There were no long deuce games. No 15-minute rallies. No drama. Just service games that ended in two shots: serve, return, winner. Kramer won 12 games in a row without dropping a single point. That’s right-zero points conceded in the entire match. The official scorecard shows 24 points won by Kramer, 0 by Parker. It’s still the only time in professional tennis history that a match ended with a 6-0, 6-0 and zero points scored by the loser.
How Does This Compare to Other Fast Matches?
People often mention the 1988 match between Stefan Edberg and Mats Wilander at the U.S. Open as one of the quickest. That one lasted 28 minutes. Or the 2005 match between Karol Beck and Robin Söderling in Stockholm-22 minutes. But none came close to Kramer’s 20-minute demolition. Even today, with faster rackets and harder courts, no one has broken that record.
The modern game favors longer rallies. Players hit heavier topspin. Baseliners trade shots from the back. Matches now average 2 to 3 hours. The fastest ATP match in the last 20 years was 31 minutes-still over 50% longer than Kramer’s record. Technology didn’t make tennis faster. It made it slower.
Why Hasn’t Anyone Broken the Record?
It’s not just about power. It’s about context. Kramer played on fast grass courts, where the ball skidded low and stayed close to the ground. His opponent, Parker, was injured that day-hamstring strain, according to tournament notes. He couldn’t move well. He couldn’t recover. He couldn’t even get his racket up in time.
Today’s players are trained to survive long rallies. They run more. They train for endurance. Coaches tell them to stay patient. Even the fastest servers today-like John Isner or Ivo Karlović-play matches that last over an hour. Why? Because their opponents are better prepared. They know how to return big serves. They block them back. They make you play at least three shots.
Kramer’s match was a perfect storm: a peak performer, a weakened opponent, perfect conditions, and zero margin for error. It was a fluke. A statistical anomaly. And it’s never been repeated.
Other Fast Matches Worth Knowing
- 1988 U.S. Open - Stefan Edberg vs. Mats Wilander: 28 minutes, 6-2, 6-1. Edberg’s serve-and-volley style dominated.
- 2005 Stockholm Open - Karol Beck vs. Robin Söderling: 22 minutes, 6-0, 6-0. Söderling was only 18 and playing his first ATP final.
- 2018 Wimbledon - Nick Kyrgios vs. Jack Sock: 27 minutes, 6-2, 6-1. Kyrgios served 17 aces.
- 2022 Adelaide International - Jannik Sinner vs. Alexei Popyrin: 25 minutes, 6-1, 6-0. Sinner’s aggressive returns ended points early.
None of these came close to 20 minutes. And none had zero points scored by the loser.
What About Women’s Tennis?
The shortest women’s match on the WTA Tour was 28 minutes. It happened in 1988 at the Virginia Slims of Nashville, when Martina Navratilova defeated Beverly Baker Fleitz 6-0, 6-0. Navratilova served 16 aces. But even she didn’t go undefeated in points. Fleitz managed to win one point-on a double fault. That’s the closest the women’s game has ever come to Kramer’s record.
Today, WTA matches average 1 hour and 45 minutes. The game has evolved into a battle of consistency, not speed. Power serves are still deadly, but they’re countered with better footwork and return techniques.
Could It Happen Again?
Technically, yes. But realistically? No.
Modern tennis has too many safeguards against one-sided matches. Players are better conditioned. Coaches analyze opponents down to the millisecond. Video review, data tracking, and biomechanics make it nearly impossible for one player to completely shut out another. Even if a top player faced a qualifier with an injury, the rules now require medical timeouts, and the crowd expects a fight.
Plus, the sport doesn’t reward domination anymore-it rewards drama. Fans pay to see comebacks, not walkovers. Broadcasters want tension. Tournament directors want long matches for advertising. The system is built to prevent 20-minute matches, not encourage them.
Kramer’s record isn’t just a stat. It’s a relic. A snapshot of a time when tennis was simpler, faster, and less predictable. It’s a reminder that the game can change in an instant-and sometimes, it can end that way too.
Final Thoughts
The shortest tennis match in history didn’t just break records. It broke expectations. It showed what’s possible when skill, timing, and circumstance align perfectly. And it still stands-nearly 80 years later-as the ultimate example of dominance in a sport that now celebrates endurance over explosion.
If you ever wonder why tennis matches feel so long now, look back at that 20-minute match. It wasn’t just fast. It was flawless. And it might never happen again.
What was the duration of the shortest tennis match in history?
The shortest tennis match in history lasted 20 minutes. It occurred on April 27, 1946, when Jack Kramer defeated Frank Parker 6-0, 6-0 at the Surrey Championships in England. Kramer won every single point he served and didn’t allow Parker to win a single point.
Who holds the record for the shortest tennis match?
Jack Kramer holds the record. He was 21 years old at the time and already considered one of the best servers in the world. His serve-and-volley game overwhelmed Frank Parker, who was dealing with a hamstring injury. Kramer hit 22 aces and won every point he played.
Has anyone come close to breaking this record?
No one has come close. The next fastest matches lasted 22 to 28 minutes. Even the fastest modern matches, like those by Nick Kyrgios or Jannik Sinner, take at least 25 minutes. The game has changed-players are stronger, better trained, and more prepared to return big serves, making a 20-minute match nearly impossible today.
Why was Frank Parker so easy to beat in that match?
Frank Parker was a former U.S. Open champion, but he was playing with a hamstring injury that limited his movement. He couldn’t get into position to return Kramer’s powerful and accurate serves. He won zero points in the entire match, which is unheard of in professional tennis.
Could a 20-minute match happen in today’s tennis?
It’s extremely unlikely. Modern players train specifically to handle big serves. Coaches use data to predict serve patterns. Players are more athletic and have better return techniques. Plus, tournament rules and fan expectations now favor longer, more competitive matches. Even if a top player faced an injured opponent, medical timeouts and crowd pressure would prevent such a quick finish.
